|
|
News
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March, 2001
ATTACK ON THE WATER: The Facts About the Personal Watercraft Ban in Our National Parks
MEDIA CONTACT:
Kristin Young
202-775-1401
Consumers are facing
an attack on our waterways. An eleventh hour, closed-door
deal with the Clinton administration may result in a ban on
personal watercraft (also known by the trade names JET SKI,
Sea Doo and Waverunner) in our national parks Ý even
in those parks specifically designed for recreational water
use.
BACKGROUND
On March 21, 2000,
the National Park Service (NPS) published a regulation banning
personal watercraft (PWC) in 66 of the 87 national parks.
In the remaining
21 parks, the Park has two years to work with communities
to decide how to handle personal watercraft use in each park.
In 11 of the remaining parks, the decision would require the
passage of a special regulation permitting personal watercraft
use. In the other 10 parks, the special regulation could be
passed, but Park Superintendents also may determine that recreational
vehicles are one of the original purposes of the waterway
and allow the use of personal watercrafts.
An extremist, anti-access
group dedicated to ending a wide-array of recreational activities
in the national park system, set their sights on personal
watercraft and filed a federal suit against the NPS to ban
all PWCs by 2002.
Wanting to be sure
the voice of the industry and the more than 19 million PWC
owners were heard, Personal Watercraft Industry Association
(PWIA) filed a motion in federal court to ensure fair and
open participation in the process.
December 20, 2000,
the NPS caved to the radical pressure and settled the lawsuit
behind closed doors, before the new administration could assess
the case and without even giving the people the opportunity
to be heard on this important issue.
A federal judge
currently is reviewing the settlement, but it is possible
that federal officials could ban personal watercrafts from
national parks (even where it is currently in use) by September
15, 2002.
WHAT
ARE THE FACTS ABOUT PERSONAL WATERCRAFT?
Forget what you
think you know about personal watercraft. A campaign of misinformation
has led many people to question personal watercraft use, but
in fact the industry has been advocating environmental stewardship,
safety and responsible access to our nation's waterways for
years. Consider the facts:
Personal watercraft
manufacturers have gone to great lengths to protect the environment,
investing in technological advances since 1998 that have resulted
in cleaner, quieter and more efficient crafts. Today's PWCs
have 75% fewer emissions and are up to 70% quieter than 1998
models.
Because PWCs have
no propellers, they do not harm sensitive marine life. A 1997
study in the Florida Keys found personal watercraft do not
harm seagrass beds or create significant water turbulence.
The average PWC
operator is not who you think it is. A study by Bowe Marketing
Research revealed the majority of personal watercraft owners
are married with families (71%). The average owner is a middle-aged,
highly educated, white-collar worker with extensive boating
experience. And 73% of those people who own personal watercraft
are the primary users.
By advocating minimum
age requirements, mandatory boating education and shoreline
sound reduction, the industry is dedicated to promoting safe
and responsible use of personal watercraft.
26 states have
implemented PWIAês model legislation requiring minimum
age requirements and mandatory boating education. In these
states, accidents have fallen dramatically. In Wisconsin,
alone, mandatory boating education has led to a 30% decrease
in PWC accidents.
The Coast Guard
reported that in the last three years PWC accidents decreased
by 3% nationwide while other all boating accidents increased
by 7%.
The recent ban
in our National Parks and other federal lands was based on
ignorance, not facts. In truth, this is the first attack in
a larger war against many recreational activities in our National
Park system. If the ban is allowed to stand, it is only a
matter of time before your favorite activity becomes the target.
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE PWC REGULATION
AFFECTED PARKS AND ACTION TAKEN
| REGULATION
|
PARKS AFFECTED |
PARK ACTION |
TOTAL PARKS |
| Use
permitted ending the passage of a special regulation for
each park by Sept. 15, 2002. |
Fire
Island Nat'l Seashore, NY |
Will
Keep |
11 |
| Big
Thicket Nat'l Preserve, TX |
Will
Keep |
| Cumberland
Isl. Nat'l Seashore, GA |
No
Action Pending |
| Padre
Island Nat'l Seashore, TX |
No
Action Pending |
| Indiana
Dunes Nat'l Lakeshore, IN |
No
Action Pending |
| Pictured
Rocks Nat'l Lakeshore, MI |
No
Action Pending |
| Assateague
Isl. Nat'l Seashore, MD/VA |
Banned |
| Cape Cod Nat'l
Seashore, MA |
Banned |
| Cape
Lookout Nat'l Seashore, NC |
Banned |
| Delaware Water
Gap Nat'l Rec. Area, PA |
Banned |
| |
|
|
|
|
Use permitted pending the passage of a special regulation
by Sept. 15, 2002, or the Park Superintendent may determine
activity is part of the original use and permit PWC
use. |
Lake
Mead Nat'l Rec. Area, IN |
Will
Keep |
10 |
| Bighorn
Canyon Nat'l Rec. Area, MI/WY |
Will
Keep |
| Lake
Powell/ Glen Canyon Nat'l Rec., UT/AZ |
Will
Keep |
| Curecanti
Nat'l Rec. Area, CO |
Will
Keep |
| Amistad
Nat'l Rec. Area, TX |
No
Action |
| Chickasaw
Nat'l Rec. Area, OK |
No
Action |
| Whiskeytown
Nat'l Rec. Area, CA |
No
Action |
| Lake
Meredith Nat'l Rec. Area, TX |
No
Action |
| Lake
Roosevelt Nat'l Rec. Area, WA |
No
Action |
| Gateway Nat'l
Rec. Area, NY/NJ |
Banned |
|